Return back

PA State Grange opposes EPA's new eight-hour

ground-level ozone standard

        For information contact: Carl Meiss, Public Relations Director  Ph: (717)-737-8855 or (800)-552-3865

Email: publicrelations@pagrange.org

October 30, 2007

 
On October 30, 2007, Betsy Huber, Master (President) of the PA State Grange, the oldest agricultural and rural advocacy organization in the Commonwealth, faxed the below letter to Stephen Johnson, Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency in Washington, D.C. notifying Mr. Johnson of the Grange's opposition to the new eight-hour ground-level ozone standard:

  

Dear Administrator Johnson:

 

I’m writing to you on behalf of the membership of the Pennsylvania State Grange to share our concern that the new eight-hour ground-level ozone standard now being considered by the EPA would not be in the best interests of rural America. The current standard, by all accounts, is working well and America should be allowed to continue the progress made under that standard.

 

The proposed new standard, however, is excessive to the point of being unattainable. It would push counties across the nation into non-attainment status, including many rural counties here in Pennsylvania.

 

As you well understand, non-attainment status would trigger automatic improvement   mandates in agricultural counties where ozone pollution has never been a problem. In those counties, the new standard would represent that very dangerous phenomenon of a solution in search of a problem.  Without solving any environmental problem, the new standard would create serious economic problems for Pennsylvania farmers in the form of operating restrictions and other costly regulations.

 

The position of the Pennsylvania Grange on clean air programs reflects the policy of the National Grange. We believe that an effective approach to clean air is a well-rounded one that takes into consideration the economic effects on all concerned, including agricultural interests. The proposed new ozone standard unfortunately fails to do this. It is an unreachable standard apparently developed without sufficient thought to its impact on the economy.

 

By contrast, the realistic current standard has helped the entire country create a productive balance between continued clean air progress and continued economic growth. On behalf of Pennsylvania’s farmers, I urge you to keep the current standard in place.

 

Very Truly Yours,

 

Betsy Huber, Master, Pennsylvania State Grange