Return back

Geist Says Turnpike's Plan to Toll I-80 Has Hit a Roadblock
 

        For information contact: Carl Meiss, Public Relations Director  Ph: (717)-737-8855 or (800)-552-3865

Email: publicrelations@pagrange.org

December 17, 2007

 
 
Federal Highway Administration returns PA application for tolling approval, citing discrepancies and insufficient information

Rep. Rick Geist (R-Altoona), Republican Chairman of the State House Transportation Committee, today said that the Federal Highway Administration’s (FHWA) return of Pennsylvania’s application for federal authorization to toll Interstate 80 is “a major roadblock” for the plan submitted by the Pennsylvania Turnpike Commission and the Department of Transportation (PennDOT).

“Yesterday’s notification by the FHWA validates the serious concerns and reservations I and others in the General Assembly have had all along regarding the application itself and the tolling plan that it seeks to authorize,” Geist said. “It is crystal clear that this application lacks basic information that the federal government needs to render a decision on this issue.”

On Oct. 13, the Turnpike Commission and PennDOT submitted a joint application to toll I-80 under the federal Interstate System Reconstruction and Rehabilitation Pilot Program (ISRRPP). The tolling proposal is the linchpin for Pennsylvania’s newly minted transportation funding plan, enacted on July 18 as Act 44 of 2007. Act 44 authorizes the Turnpike Commission to borrow up to $12 billion, with the assumption that the federal government will grant Pennsylvania the authority to toll Interstate 80.

That assumption is now more tenuous following the FHWA’s move yesterday. A letter sent from FHWA’s Acting Division Administrator David Lawton to Pennsylvania Secretary of Transportation Allen Biehler included a memorandum from the FHWA and an itemized list of additional items required to address the eligibility of the proposal.

“At this time, the application does not contain all of the information required for a Phase I provisional acceptance, as specified in our guidance, or a conditional provisional approval,” Lawton said in the letter. “No slot in the ISRRPP is reserved for your proposal.”

The FHWA also indicated that it has questions regarding the use of revenue that would be generated from the tolling of I-80 for purposes other than the maintenance or improvement of I-80, and regarding the structure of the 50-year lease agreement between the Turnpike Commission and PennDOT.

The FHWA has recommended that the Turnpike Commission and PennDOT revise and resubmit the application “if you intend to pursue this proposal further.”

Geist said the FHWA’s decision to return the application, albeit without approval or denial, casts considerable doubt on the prospects for timely federal approval of the I-80 tolling plan.

“Now more than ever, it is time to seriously explore an innovative and viable alternative to our transportation infrastructure needs – public-private partnerships,” Geist said. “Through these partnerships, private-sector capital could be invested, with the interest earned being used exclusively to fund transportation infrastructure needs well into the future. Projects could be completed more quickly and more efficiently. Thousands of Pennsylvanians could be put to work rebuilding the infrastructure. And future generations would not be strapped by massive debt payments.”

Rep. Richard A. Geist
79th District
Pennsylvania House of Representatives
(814) 946-7218
(717) 787-6419
Contact: Greg Grasa
ggrasa@pahousegop.com
(717) 772-3468
Member site: WWW.RickGeist.com 
www.pahousegop.com